Tuesday, May 10, 2011

peter callesen






he is simply amazing

i really love how he plays around with positive negative space
how the subject and its "shadow" is linked
like living VS dead
hee hee. im in love with his works

i dont think i'll be able to do 3D stuff like him
cause it requires some origami knowledge
which i have none
oh well

for more : http://www.petercallesen.com/text/text.html
http://www.petercallesen.com/index/index2.html

Monday, May 9, 2011

Artists have a social responsibility to uphold.

First and foremost, what is social responsibility? I feel that it is duty of one to either benefit the society or simply avoid harmful acts.

I believe that art is a way of speaking without words. It is the way of communicating for some people, as perhaps, words are not their thing. So I was thinking, since people should be responsible of what they say, so how different is it from speaking through art?

Regarding whether or not artists have a social responsibility to uphold, I feel that it sometimes depends on what type of art they create: private or public.

For public art, the artists definitely need to have social responsibility as the art is placed in the public where anyone and everyone can see and comment. The impact is great as it is readily available to all to experience at anytime and no one can control the audience of the artwork. The artist, when creating the artwork, would have to realize that people of all ages, races, culture would view the work, and hence, the artwork must not be offensive to anyone. The artist has to ensure that the artwork is pleasing to the eye and no one feels uncomfortable viewing it. The fact that the art is placed in the public, the public is indirectly “forced” to view the works. Hence the artwork should not touch on sensitive issues such as religion, gender, race, etc. If these artworks do touch on these issues, they are often abstract, so abstract that the public have no idea what it is about, so as to prevent any public outrage.

Many artists create art as they have things to say about life and yet there are unable to voice it out. An example would be Lucia Hartini works, like “spying eyes”. Due to the society she was in, she was unable to express her thoughts and feeling too directly and hence had to use symbols in her art.



However, I feel that for private art, the artists should be allowed to express their emotions or what they think is right via their artworks. There should not be any restriction to what one wants to create and feel like creating. If the artist created an artwork which touches on sensitive issues, but he or she just keeps it at home, what social responsibility does he or she have to uphold? If not kept at home, private art are placed in galleries or museums, usually seen by people who willingly and voluntarily go and see the art purposefully. These artworks may not always be pretty, some are offensive and provocative. In a way, these people are “prepared to be offended”. I think that a “good” art may not be a “pretty” art; instead, it should be able to express the artist ideas and feelings to the viewer clearly and I believe that people who steps into an art museum should be mentally prepared to be “provoked by the art”.



For example, Marcel Duchamp shocked the public with his work fountain (1917), which is basically just a urinal. He challenged the definition of art and some viewed his work as absolutely absurd. However, in his eyes, that urinal is a piece of art as he himself chose it. He expressed his own definition of art via that urinal and it resulted in a huge uproar. People now have gradually gotten used to this work, or have they?

As I looked through the numerous artworks which people named as “offensive”, I was thinking, who are they to decide whether or not the art is offensive? Perhaps, it is the society itself which has a responsibility to uphold. Everyone feels differently towards what is hateful, unethical or not morally upright, so the “offensive art” actually shows a society’s thinking and perspective. Perhaps, it is not the wrong of the art, but how the person actually views the work?

I feel that some artists are just looking for trouble in a way that they touched on very sensitive issues like religion, mutating the forms of the gods, depicting them in provocative ways. Some examples found here: http://www.thesharkguys.com/lists/top-10-offensive-religious-art-pieces-part-one/
Perhaps the artists did them on purpose, but I do think they are slightly overboard. But then again, that is my own point of view.

Tuesday, May 3, 2011

this is really cool

his works sort of reminds me of han sai por
doesn't it?
smooth smooth surface
random shapes that makes no sense
hee hee
enjoy

Tuesday, April 12, 2011

YOUTUBE

amazing
but slightly disturbing
haha


the same person:D

ahhhhahhh i love his voice

same person again!
im so amazed by his voice


haha this is cool too

Sunday, April 10, 2011

SOVA Assignment: Lucia Hartini


Srikandi by Lucia Hartini 1993

a) Lucia Hartini painted Srikandi in 1993 to depict her ability to face challenges in life in the material world. It is a nearly life size painting with near perfect likeness to the artist herself, presenting herself as a female warrior.
A muscular woman with arms akimbo, draped in a long blue cloth, stands with confidence in the centre of the painting. The woman gives off a sense of authority and strength. Hartini wanted to depict a daring female knight character of the Javanese shadow theatre. The woman clenches her fists, holds her head up, pushes her chin out and stares straight at the numerous eyes before her with absolutely no fear.
The walls behind her zigzags into a distance. The vanishing point and the lines created by the brick walls give the painting a sense of space and depth. It also separates the background into two: the walls and the sky. The sky suggests that it was either sunrise or sunset as the artist painted the sky with a slight tinge of yellowish-orange for the top, while the bottom consists of dark gloomy clouds. A luminous spherical object which is most probably the moon rests gently in the sky, giving a very soothing and peaceful feeling. Hartini created the sense of space by the way she placed her subject matters, with the woman in front, the walls zigzagging, leading the viewers’ eyes to the back, and the sky all the way in the background. However this composition seems rather unrealistic as the walls seem to float in the sky and the ratio of the size of the woman and the walls is unproportional to real life.
The artists played around with the contrast of the texture of the subject matter. The hard, solid and angular brick walls are placed next to the soft clouds with undefined shapes and also the flowy and fluid blue drapery. There is also the contrast between the colours used. Hartini used complementary colours, blue for the sky and cloth, orange for the bricks and skin tone of the woman. The use of complementary makes the female warrior stand out even more and makes the image more vivid and impactful.
As for the brushstrokes, they are nearly invisible to the human eye and every stroke seems extremely careful, smooth and well-blended. The artwork is painted in great detail, showing each and every fold of the cloth, the cracks of the brick walls, and the popping veins of the woman. The artist also painted the highlights and shadows of the drapery and of the arms of the woman.
The painting is painted in a surrealistic manner, with an unnatural composition but with extremely elaborate and realistic subject matters.

b) Lucia Hartini’s art are reflection of her own self and her interpretation of her environment. Hence her artworks are closely related to the socio-political conditions of Indonesia, where they believe that all females are to know how to cook, look pretty and bear children for the family. The status of a female always depends on the male and they are always regarded as “subordinate” to man, an obedient subject to the male orders and admonition.
Hartini herself is a victim of sexism in Indonesia. During her time, most contemporary were man and she was one of the very few female artists who make a living fully from painting. Although she is married, her husband seldom goes home and she has to raise her children alone. Therefore, she developed the habit of painting after tucking her children to bed. This is a possible influence of the frequently occurring moon in her paintings. A pale yellow moon can be seen in the background of Srikandi (1993).
Before painting Srikandi, Hartini had a hard time struggling to be herself due to her social status as an artist and the expectations of women in society. Afterwards, she felt that she should not be frightened anymore. Hartini feels that women should represent themselves as autonomous subjects having potential which is different but no less capable than that of their male counterparts in this shared world. Hence she painted Lucia Hartini, depicting female knight standing proud and tall, daring and powerful. The female subject’s gaze transfixes the eyeballs of society’s judging and scrutinising.
Lucia Hartini was born into a natural, quiet and peaceful environment, where she spends her childhood walking around and playing. Hence, she feels strongly for the environment and after she grew up, she had a strong longing for a similar natural environment. Thus she likes depicting outer space, planets, and biomorphic rocks from her imagination, also explaining the clouds and moon in Srikandi.
Hartini often depicts her subject matters in rhythmic fine lines like reciting a mantra over and over again, and she lets herself get carried away as though she is meditating. This makes her stray away from reality and hence she often paints unrealistic scenes of her own imagination, where the world is fantastic and dreamlike. This explains why Srikandi’s composition is so fantasy like and strays away from the real world.
Lucia Hartini uses colours to express her feelings, happiness and unhappiness, from her daily life onto her canvass. Hence the blue used in Srikandi most likely represents the calmness in her heart, no longer fearing the society’s scrutinising and the orange bricks represents strength, telling herself to stand strong and remain unfearful. The orange glow of her skin gives off a radiant and healthy feeling, making Srikandi look braver and more confident.

MOUSTACHE

LADY MOUSTACHE


BOY MOUSTACHE


BABY MOUSTACHE


DOG PACIFIER MOUSTACHE


NATURAL MOUSTACHE

Friday, March 18, 2011

ugly stuff

i was so sian that i started to cut paper


and it got uglier


and uglier


so i decided to do something i did before :D
the hat!


unfold


unfold


yay the hat!


but they are so ugly that this is where they went

Monday, March 7, 2011

panda!

HAHA this is what i did during career conference :P

panda 1!


panda 2!


-.-


:D

Tuesday, March 1, 2011

SEC 3 EOY :PLAY!

sec 3 end of year

final work
wasn't really what i expected.
oh well.


last minute compositions


random ideas


yay! i love this


castle sketches


disney characters


other stuff:
oil painting


toodles